Guaranteed analysis
Specify minimum phosphorus and calcium, maximum moisture and any other nutrient limits used by your formulation and incoming-control teams.
Procurement guide
Compare monocalcium phosphate and dicalcium phosphate for feed procurement, including nutrient identity, assay, physical form, contaminants and documentation.
MCP and DCP are feed mineral sources, but commercial products can differ in phosphorus, calcium, moisture, particle size and impurity profile. Buyers should compare an agreed specification, not abbreviations alone.
Monocalcium phosphate and dicalcium phosphate contain different proportions of calcium and phosphorus. Commercial feed-grade material may also differ by hydration state and manufacturing route. Confirm the declared chemical form and guaranteed nutrient levels for the actual product.
Specify minimum phosphorus and calcium, maximum moisture and any other nutrient limits used by your formulation and incoming-control teams.
Set limits for fluorine, arsenic, lead, cadmium and other relevant contaminants in line with destination-market rules and your risk assessment. Request the current specification and a representative or batch COA.
Particle-size distribution, powder or granular form, caking tendency and flow can influence blending, segregation and handling. State these requirements in the RFQ.
Confirm the SDS, specification, COA format, manufacturer or site information, feed registration status where applicable, and certificates required by the destination. Feed-grade status is source-specific and should not be inferred from the name MCP or DCP.
Review the product information for feed-grade MCP or feed-grade DCP before preparing your inquiry.
Include the full chemical name, grade, target specification, quantity, packing, destination and required documents.